A letter to The New York Times

Dear The New York Times journalist,

I do realize that Apple’s 3G iPhone is one of the most talked about consumer products today. I do realize that people are still interested in hearing about 3G iPhone, its merits, and demerits. But then, haven’t you already discussed this issue to death?

When you came up with the brilliant discovery that the new 3G iPhone actually costs more than the old one, I was really taken aback. And if you remember, I already wrote a rebuttal for that. And now, you come up with this. What do I say?

The story is this – Apple sells its iPhone for $600 to those who don’t want the two-year contract with AT&T. Those who come under the contract can pay just $199. You see, we’re fine with that. But then, when you quote some market research firm and say that the iPhone is actually worth only around $170, aren’t you stretching things a little too far?

And how the hell did someone come up with that arbitrary figure? Based on the cost of the hardware components in the phone alone? Hello, ever heard of something called R&D? When you price a product, you have to take the cost of R&D, designing, and marketing into consideration. So, claiming that the iPhone is worth only around $170 based on the value of its components is not just incorrect, it’s plain stupid.

Sensationalizing issues is better left to bloggers like me. You, being a journalist, are supposed to be neutral and most importantly, well informed.

Thanks.

Tags: 3g iphone, Apple, bloggers, brilliant discovery, iPhone, journalist, journalists, merits and demerits, new york times, rebuttal